FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150  
151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   >>   >|  
GEORGE BALLARD (1706-1755) The extreme wickedness of reviewers has been a conviction with many authors--who have sometimes, it would seem, succumbed to it themselves and retaliated in reviewing others. The following letter to Dr. Lyttelton, Dean of Exeter, is a very early (1753) and not unamusing example of this conviction: and is given as such, though the writer has no wide fame. His history is, however, interesting and shows, among other things, how entirely erroneous is the idea that till recently (and even now to some extent) opportunities of showing themselves able to profit by education were and are denied to the "lower classes" in England. Ballard was apprenticed to a staymaker ("habit-maker" as others say) at Chipping-Campden, but betook himself in his leisure hours to the study of Anglo-Saxon. Hearing of which fact the gentlemen of the local hunt (the boozy squire-tyrants of popular tradition) subscribed for an annuity of L100 a year to him, but he would only accept L60. With this he went up to Oxford to enjoy the Bodleian, was made a "clerk" at Magdalen and later an esquire-bedell to the University. He did much good work of the antiquarian kind, and died a year or two after writing this letter, having (one hopes) relieved himself by his protest and been consoled by a kind answer from Lyttelton.[106] 19. TO DR. LYTTELTON, DEAN OF EXETER A DEFENCE OF THE HISTORY OF LEARNED LADIES Revd. and Hond. Sir, My best acknowledgments are due for the favour of two epistles; the first of which I received a few minutes after my last set forward for Exeter. I would have answered it immediately, but that I thought a little respite might be agreeable, before I gave you the trouble of another long letter. The day before I received your first epistle, a Gent. of my acquaintance brought me the _Monthly Review_ for February, that I might see what the candid and genteel authors of that work had said of mine. They observe to the publick, that _I have said_ C. Tishem was so skilled in the Greek Tongue, that she could read Galen in its original, which very few Physicians are able to do. Whether this was done maliciously, in order to bring the wrath of the AEsculapians upon me, or inadvertently, I cannot say: but I may justly affirm, that they have used me very ill in that affair; since if th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150  
151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

letter

 
received
 

Lyttelton

 

Exeter

 

authors

 

conviction

 
answered
 
immediately
 

LEARNED

 
forward

LADIES

 

thought

 

consoled

 

HISTORY

 

protest

 

respite

 

answer

 

DEFENCE

 
acknowledgments
 

favour


EXETER

 

epistles

 

minutes

 

relieved

 
LYTTELTON
 

acquaintance

 
Whether
 

maliciously

 

Physicians

 
original

AEsculapians

 

affair

 

affirm

 

inadvertently

 

justly

 

Tongue

 
epistle
 

Monthly

 

brought

 

agreeable


trouble

 

Review

 

February

 

publick

 
observe
 
Tishem
 

skilled

 

candid

 
genteel
 

things