FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>   >|  
TED 142 INTRODUCTION For almost 30 years North American herpetologists have been making extensive collections of reptiles and amphibians in Mexico. Some parts of the country, because of their accessibility, soon became relatively well known; other regions lying off the beaten path were bypassed or inadequately sampled. Principally in the last decade herpetologists have been entering regions from which no collections previously were available in an attempt to fill gaps in known distributions and to discover unknown species of animals. In 1950 Dr. Donald D. Brand led an exploration party from the University of Texas to the poorly explored and faunistically unknown region of southwestern Michoacan. James A. Peters accompanied Brand and collected amphibians and reptiles. In 1951 I welcomed the opportunity to accompany Brand on a second expedition to southwestern Michoacan. Such was the beginning of my interest in the herpetofauna of the region. I have been fortunate to return to Michoacan on four successive trips, all of which had as their purpose the accumulation of data on the herpetofauna that would result in a survey of the component species and an analysis of their distribution. My original intention was to amplify Peters' (1954) study based on the collections made by him in 1950 and by me in 1951 in the Sierra de Coalcoman. But it soon became evident that in order to understand the relationships of the herpetofauna of the Sierra de Coalcoman, the species inhabiting the Tepalcatepec Valley and adjacent mountain ranges would have to be studied. In the course of making that study I examined all specimens from Michoacan already in museums. There have been few detailed herpetofaunal studies in Mexico. The first such study of any consequence was that by Bogert and Oliver (1945) on the herpetofauna of Sonora. In that paper the authors analyzed the fauna from a geographic view and showed the transition from tropical species in the southern part of the state to members of the Sonoran Desert assemblage to the north. Martin (1958) made a detailed study of the herpetofauna of the Gomez Farias region in southern Tamaulipas; he emphasized the ecological distribution of amphibians and reptiles in that region with special reference to cloud forests. Duellman (1958c) presented a preliminary geographic analysis of the herpetofauna of Colima with special reference to the continuity of the species i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

herpetofauna

 

species

 
Michoacan
 
region
 
reptiles
 

collections

 

amphibians

 

Peters

 

southern

 

unknown


geographic

 

herpetologists

 

Coalcoman

 

analysis

 

reference

 
special
 

distribution

 
southwestern
 

making

 
Mexico

regions

 

detailed

 
Sierra
 

continuity

 

specimens

 

examined

 

museums

 

relationships

 

evident

 

understand


mountain

 
ranges
 

adjacent

 

Valley

 

inhabiting

 

Tepalcatepec

 

studied

 

Oliver

 

Martin

 

assemblage


Desert

 

members

 

Sonoran

 

Farias

 

Tamaulipas

 

Duellman

 
presented
 
forests
 
emphasized
 

ecological