FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137  
138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   >>   >|  
e pertinently insolent." "Did you say that in support of your statement that you never kissed him?" "No. It is a childish question." But Carson was not to be warded off; like a terrier he sprang again and again: "Why, sir, did you mention that this boy was extremely ugly?" "For this reason. If I were asked why I did not kiss a door-mat, I should say because I do not like to kiss door-mats."... "Why did you mention his ugliness?" "It is ridiculous to imagine that any such thing could have occurred under any circumstances." "Then why did you mention his ugliness, I ask you?" "Because you insulted me by an insulting question." "Was that a reason why you should say the boy was ugly?" (Here the witness began several answers almost inarticulately and finished none of them. His efforts to collect his ideas were not aided by Mr. Carson's sharp staccato repetition: "Why? why? why did you add that?") At last the witness answered: "You sting me and insult me and at times one says things flippantly." Then came the re-examination by Sir Edward Clarke, which brought out very clearly the hatred of Lord Alfred Douglas for his father. Letters were read and in one letter Queensberry declared that Oscar had plainly shown the white feather when he called on him. One felt that this was probably true: Queensberry's word on such a point could be accepted. In the re-examination Sir Edward Clarke occupied himself chiefly with two youths, Shelley and Conway, who had been passed over casually by Mr. Carson. In answer to his questions Oscar stated that Shelley was a youth in the employ of Mathews and Lane, the publishers. Shelley had very good taste in literature and a great desire for culture. Shelley had read all his books and liked them. Shelley had dined with him and his wife at Tite Street. Shelley was in every way a gentleman. He had never gone with Charlie Parker to the Savoy Hotel. A juryman wanted to know at this point whether the witness was aware of the nature of the article, "The Priest and the Acolyte," in _The Chameleon_. "I knew nothing of it; it came as a terrible shock to me." This answer contrasted strangely with the light tone of his reply to the same question on the previous day. The re-examination did not improve Oscar's position. It left all the facts where they were, and at least a suspicion in every mind. Sir Edward Clarke intimated that this concluded the evidence for the prosecu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137  
138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shelley

 

mention

 

examination

 

Edward

 

Clarke

 

witness

 

question

 
Carson
 

answer

 

Queensberry


ugliness
 

reason

 

culture

 

Street

 
desire
 
chiefly
 

occupied

 

literature

 

insolent

 

pertinently


questions

 

casually

 

Conway

 

stated

 
publishers
 

passed

 

employ

 
youths
 

Mathews

 

juryman


previous

 

improve

 

contrasted

 

strangely

 

position

 

intimated

 

concluded

 

evidence

 
prosecu
 

suspicion


terrible

 

accepted

 

wanted

 

Charlie

 

Parker

 

Chameleon

 

Acolyte

 

Priest

 
nature
 

article