FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   >>  
am so ignorant as not to know the original and cotemporary authority. 3. Your learned correspondent, DR. MAITLAND, in his _Dark Ages_, snubs D'Aubigne most unmercifully for repeating an old story about Luther's stumbling upon a Bible, and pooh-pooh's D'Aubigne's authority, Mathesius, as no better than a goose. May I ask whether it is possible to discover the probable foundation of such a story, and whether Luther has left us in his writings any account of his early familiarity with Scripture, that would bear upon the alleged incident, and show how much of it may be true? C.F.S. * * * * * MINOR QUERIES _The Lost Tribes._--A list of all the theories and publications respecting the ten tribes commonly called the Lost tribes, or any communication concerning them, will much oblige. JARLTZBERG. _Partrige Family._--Can any of your readers inform me where I can see the grant mentioned in the following _note_ taken from Strype's _Ecclesiastical Memorials_, vol. iii. p. 542: "I find a grant to the Lady Jane Partrige for life, of the manor of Kenne in Devon, of the yearly value of 57l. 12s. 0-3/4d., but this not before April, 1553." Can any of your readers tell me how to obtain access to a private act 1st Mary, Sessio secunda. cap. 9., anno 1553, intituled, "An Act for the Restitution in Blood of the Heirs of Sir Miles Partrige, Knight"? Strype calls it an act for the restitution of the daughters of Sir Miles Partrige, and I think he must be right, as I have prima facie proof that Sir Miles left no son. Were the debates on the acts of parliament recorded in those days, and if so, how can they be seen? J. PARTRIGE. Birmingham. _Commoner marrying a Peeress._--Formerly, when a commoner married a peeress in her own right, he assumed her title and dignity. The right was, I believe, disputed during the reign of Henry VIII., in the case of the claimant of the barony of Talbois, when it was decided that no man could take his wife's titles unless he had issue male by her, but, if there were such issue, he became, as in cases of landed property, "tenant by curtesy" of her dignities. Can any of your correspondents inform me whether any subsequent decision has deprived of this right a commoner marrying a peeress and having issue male by her? L.R.N. _The Character "&."_--What is the correct name of the character "&?" I have heard it called _ample-se-and_, _ampuzzand_, _empuzad_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   >>  



Top keywords:

Partrige

 

readers

 

commoner

 

tribes

 

called

 

peeress

 

Strype

 

marrying

 

inform

 

authority


Luther
 

Aubigne

 

parliament

 
empuzad
 

recorded

 

debates

 

character

 

Character

 
correct
 

Knight


restitution

 

ampuzzand

 
daughters
 

intituled

 

Restitution

 
PARTRIGE
 

Talbois

 

decided

 

tenant

 

barony


claimant
 

curtesy

 
secunda
 
landed
 

titles

 

property

 

Peeress

 

Formerly

 

deprived

 

decision


Commoner
 

Birmingham

 

subsequent

 

married

 
dignities
 

disputed

 

dignity

 

correspondents

 

assumed

 
account