"I'm perfectly shameless," proclaimed Ethel Wing. "I've lost my heart
to him, and I don't care who knows it. Why in the world didn't you marry
him?"
"But--where did you see him?" Honora demanded as soon as she could
command herself sufficiently to speak. Her voice must have sounded odd.
Ethel did not appear to notice that.
"He lunched with us one day when father had gout. Didn't he tell you
about it? He said he was coming to see you that afternoon."
"Yes--he came. But he didn't mention being at lunch at your house."
"I'm sure that was like him," declared her friend. And for the
first time in her life Honora experienced a twinge of that world-old
ailment--jealousy. How did Ethel know what was like him? "I made father
give him up for a little while after lunch, and he talked about you the
whole time. But he was most interesting at the table," continued Ethel,
sublimely unconscious of the lack of compliment in the comparison; "as
Jim would say, he fairly wiped up the ground with father, and it isn't
an easy thing to do."
"Wiped up the ground with Mr. Wing!" Honora repeated.
"Oh, in a delightfully quiet, humorous way. That's what made it so
effective. I couldn't understand all of it; but I grasped enough to
enjoy it hugely. Father's so used to bullying people that it's become
second nature with him. I've seen him lay down the law to some of the
biggest lawyers in New York, and they took it like little lambs. He
caught a Tartar in Mr. Erwin. I didn't dare to laugh, but I wanted to."
"What was the discussion about?" asked Honora.
"I'm not sure that I can give you a very clear idea of it," said Ethel.
"Generally speaking, it was about modern trust methods, and what a
self-respecting lawyer would do and what he wouldn't. Father took the
ground that the laws weren't logical, and that they were different
and conflicting, anyway, in different States. He said they impeded the
natural development of business, and that it was justifiable for the
great legal brains of the country to devise means by which these laws
could be eluded. He didn't quite say that, but he meant it, and he
honestly believes it. The manner in which Mr. Erwin refuted it was a
revelation to me. I've been thinking about it since. You see, I'd never
heard that side of the argument. Mr. Erwin said, in the nicest way
possible, but very firmly, that a lawyer who hired himself out to enable
one man to take advantage of another prostituted his talents:
|