FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1894   1895   1896   1897   1898   1899   1900   1901   1902   1903   1904   1905   1906   1907   1908   1909   1910   1911   1912   1913   1914   1915   1916   1917   1918  
1919   1920   1921   1922   1923   1924   1925   1926   1927   1928   1929   1930   1931   1932   1933   1934   1935   1936   1937   1938   1939   1940   1941   1942   1943   >>   >|  
, facts alone can determine, and to facts we have had recourse to settle it. The following statement is made by Dr. Meigs in his 142d paragraph, and developed more at length, with rhetorical amplifications, in the 134th. "No human being, save a pregnant or parturient woman, is susceptible to the poison." This statement is wholly incorrect, as I am sorry to have to point out to a Teacher in Dr. Meigs's position. I do not object to the erudition which quotes Willis and Fernelius, the last of whom was pleasantly said to have "preserved the dregs of the Arabs in the honey of his Latinity." But I could wish that more modern authorities had not been overlooked. On this point, for instance, among the numerous facts disproving the statement, the "American Journal of Medical Sciences," published not far from his lecture-room, would have presented him with a respectable catalog of such cases. Thus he might refer to Mr. Storrs's paper "On the Contagious Effects of Puerperal Fever on the Male Subject; or on Persons not Childbearing" (Jan. 1846), or to Dr. Reid's case (April, 1846), or to Dr. Barron's statement of the children's dying of peritonitis in an epidemic of puerperal fever at the Philadelphia Hospital (Oct. 1842), or to various instances cited in Dr. Kneeland's article (April, 186). Or, if he would have referred to the "New York Journal," he might have seen Prof. Austin Flint's cases. Or, if he had honored my Essay so far, he might have found striking instances of the same kind in the first of the new series of cases there reported and elsewhere. I do not see the bearing of his proposition, if it were true. But it is one of those assertions that fall in a moment before a slight examination of the facts; and I confess my surprise, that a professor who lectures on the Diseases of Women should have ventured to make it. Nearly seven pages are devoted to showing that I was wrong in saying I would not be "understood to imply that there exists a doubt in the mind of any well-informed member of the medical profession as to the fact that puerperal fever is sometimes communicated from one person to another, both directly and indirectly." I will devote seven lines to these seven pages, which seven lines, if I may say it without offence, are, as it seems to me, six more than are strictly necessary. The following authors are cited as sceptics by Dr. Meigs: Dewees.--I cited the same passage. Did not know half the facts. Robert Lee.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1894   1895   1896   1897   1898   1899   1900   1901   1902   1903   1904   1905   1906   1907   1908   1909   1910   1911   1912   1913   1914   1915   1916   1917   1918  
1919   1920   1921   1922   1923   1924   1925   1926   1927   1928   1929   1930   1931   1932   1933   1934   1935   1936   1937   1938   1939   1940   1941   1942   1943   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

statement

 
Journal
 

puerperal

 

instances

 

moment

 

slight

 

examination

 

surprise

 

professor

 

confess


referred

 

assertions

 

bearing

 

honored

 

proposition

 

striking

 

series

 

Austin

 

reported

 

offence


directly

 

indirectly

 

devote

 

Robert

 

passage

 

Dewees

 

strictly

 

authors

 
sceptics
 

person


showing

 

understood

 
devoted
 

Nearly

 

Diseases

 

ventured

 

exists

 

profession

 

medical

 

communicated


member

 

informed

 
lectures
 

Subject

 

object

 
position
 

erudition

 

quotes

 

Willis

 
Teacher