FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815  
816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   >>   >|  
These are questions asked me. Nature has proved a wise teacher, as I think, in my own case. The older I grow, the less use I make of alcoholic stimulants. In fact, I hardly meddle with them at all, except a glass or two of champagne occasionally. I find that by far the best borne of all drinks containing alcohol. I do not suppose my experience can be the foundation of a universal rule. Dr. Holyoke, who lived to be a hundred, used habitually, in moderate quantities, a mixture of cider, water, and rum. I think, as one grows older, less food, especially less animal food, is required. But old people have a right to be epicures, if they can afford it. The pleasures of the palate are among the last gratifications of the senses allowed them. We begin life as little cannibals,--feeding on the flesh and blood of our mothers. We range through all the vegetable and animal products, of nature, and I suppose, if the second childhood could return to the food of the first, it might prove a wholesome diet. What do I say to smoking? I cannot grudge an old man his pipe, but I think tobacco often does a good deal of harm to the health,--to the eyes especially, to the nervous system generally, producing headache, palpitation, and trembling. I myself gave it up many years ago. Philosophically speaking, I think self-narcotization and self-alcoholization are rather ignoble substitutes for undisturbed self-consciousness and unfettered self-control. Here is another of those brain-tapping letters, of similar character, which I have no objection to answering at my own time and in the place which best suits me. As the questions must be supposed to be asked with a purely scientific and philanthropic purpose, it can make little difference when and where they are answered. For myself, I prefer our own tea-table to the symposia to which I am often invited. I do not quarrel with those who invite their friends to a banquet to which many strangers are expected to contribute. It is a very easy and pleasant way of giving an entertainment at little cost and with no responsibility. Somebody has been writing to me about "Oatmeal and Literature," and somebody else wants to know whether I have found character influenced by diet; also whether, in my opinion, oatmeal is preferable to pie as an American national food. In answer to these questions, I should say that I have my beliefs and prejudices; but if I were pressed hard for my proofs of their correctnes
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815  
816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

questions

 

suppose

 
animal
 

character

 

purely

 

difference

 

purpose

 
scientific
 

philanthropic

 

supposed


alcoholization

 

narcotization

 

ignoble

 

substitutes

 
speaking
 

Philosophically

 

undisturbed

 

consciousness

 

similar

 

letters


objection

 

answering

 
tapping
 
unfettered
 
control
 

answered

 
banquet
 

influenced

 
opinion
 
oatmeal

Oatmeal
 

Literature

 
preferable
 
prejudices
 

pressed

 

proofs

 
beliefs
 
American
 

national

 
answer

writing

 

invite

 

quarrel

 

friends

 

strangers

 

expected

 
invited
 

prefer

 
symposia
 

contribute