FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63  
64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>   >|  
The school that flourished in this age, and devoted its muse to gay and amorous poetry, was but a natural reaction from the stern, harsh views of the Puritan, who despised and condemned _belles lettres_ as the wickedness of sin and folly. Suckling's poems are few in number, and, with rare exceptions, are all brief. The most lengthy is the _Sessions of the Poets_, a satire upon the poets of his day, from rare Ben Jonson, with Carew and Davenant, down to those of less note-- 'Selwin and Walter, and Bartlett both the brothers, Jack Vaughan, and Porter, and divers others.' The versification is defective, but the satire is piquant, and no doubt discriminating and just. At any rate, what the poet says of himself hits the truth nearer than confessions commonly do: 'Suckling next was called, but did not appear; But straight one whispered Apollo i' the ear, That of all men living he cared not for't-- He loved not the muses so well as his sport; And prized black eyes, or a lucky hit At bowls, above all the trophies of wit.' In Suckling's love-songs we discover the brilliancy of Sedley, the _abandon_ of Rochester, (though hardly carried to so scandalous an extreme) and a strength and fervor which, with care for the minor matters of versification and melody, might have equaled or even surpassed the best strains of Herrick. In a complaint that his mistress will not return her heart for his that she has stolen, he says: 'I prithee send me back my heart, Since I can not have thine; For if from yours you will not part, Why, then, shouldst thou have mine? 'Yet, now I think on't, let it lie; To find it were in vain: For thou'st a thief in either eye Would steal it back again.' The following, which has always been a favorite, was originally sung by Orsames in _Aglaura_, who figures in the _dramatis personae_ as an 'anti-Platonic young lord': 'Why so pale and wan, fond lover? Prithee, why so pale? Will, when looking well can't move her, Looking ill prevail? Prithee, why so pale? 'Why so dull and mute, young sinner? Prithee, why so mute? Will, when speaking well can't win her, Saying nothing do't? Prithee, why so mute? 'Quit, quit, for shame; this will not move, This can not take her; If of herself she will not love, Nothing can make her-- The devil take her!' We are tempted to add s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63  
64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Prithee

 

Suckling

 

satire

 

versification

 

matters

 
melody
 

fervor

 

shouldst

 
equaled
 

Herrick


strains

 

complaint

 

mistress

 
return
 

stolen

 
prithee
 

surpassed

 

prevail

 
sinner
 

speaking


Looking

 

Saying

 

tempted

 

Nothing

 

Platonic

 

Aglaura

 

Orsames

 

figures

 
dramatis
 

personae


strength

 
favorite
 

originally

 

Jonson

 

Davenant

 

Sessions

 

lengthy

 

divers

 

Porter

 

defective


piquant

 

Vaughan

 

Walter

 
Selwin
 

Bartlett

 

brothers

 
poetry
 
amorous
 

natural

 

reaction