FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32  
33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   >>   >|  
hey speak very incorrect English. The few words that follow, and which occurred in some conversations the Author had with the most intelligent of the Gipsies he has met, prove how incorrectly they speak _our_ language; and yet it would be worse than folly to attempt to prove that they are not natives of England. Expencival _for_ expensive. Cide _for_ decide. Device _for_ advice. Dixen _for_ dictionary. {18} Ealfully _for_ equally. Indistructed _for_ instructed. Gemmem _for_ gentleman. Dauntment _for_ daunted. Spiteliness _for_ spitefulness. Hawcus Paccus _for_ Habeas Corpus. Increach _for_ increase. Commist _for_ submit. Brand, in his observations on POPULAR ANTIQUITIES, is of opinion that the first Gipsies fled from Asia, when the cruel Timur Beg ravaged India, with a view to proselyte the heathen to the Mohammedan religion; at which time about 500,000 human beings were butchered by him. Some suppose, that, soon after this time, many who escaped the sword of this human fury, came into Europe through Egypt; and on this account were called, in English, GIPSIES. Although there is not the least reason whatever to suppose the Gipsies to have had an Egyptian origin, and although, as we have asserted in a former page, they are strangers in that land of wonders to the present day; yet it appears possible to me, that Egypt may have had something to do with their present appellation. And allowing that the supposition is well founded, which ascribes to them a passage through Egypt into European nations, it is very likely they found their way to that place under the following circumstances. In the years 1408 and 1409, Timur Beg ravaged India, to make, as has already been observed, proselytes to the Mohammedan delusion, when he put hundreds of thousands of its inhabitants to the sword. It is very rational to suppose, that numbers of those who had the happiness not to be overtaken by an army so dreadful, on account of the cruelties it perpetrated, should save their lives by flying from their native land, to become wandering strangers in another. Now if we assert that the Gipsies were of the Suder cast of Asiatic Indians, and that they found their way from Hindostan into other and remote countries when Timur Beg spread around him terrors so dreadful, it is natural to ask, why did not some of the other casts of India accompany them? This objection has no weight at all when we consider the hatr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32  
33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Gipsies

 

suppose

 

Mohammedan

 

ravaged

 

account

 

dreadful

 

present

 

strangers

 

English

 

circumstances


observed
 

proselytes

 

inhabitants

 
rational
 

numbers

 

thousands

 

delusion

 

hundreds

 
appellation
 

allowing


supposition

 

nations

 
European
 

passage

 

founded

 
ascribes
 

happiness

 

terrors

 

natural

 

spread


countries
 

Hindostan

 
remote
 
weight
 

objection

 

accompany

 

Indians

 

Asiatic

 

perpetrated

 

cruelties


dictionary
 

overtaken

 

incorrect

 

flying

 
native
 

assert

 

wandering

 

appears

 

expensive

 
Expencival