FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  
TH ESTATE. I cannot say how it may have been in other large cities and towns, but certainly the newspaper mortality in Birmingham during the past half century has been quite distressing. I think that without difficulty I could reckon up from twenty-five to thirty papers and journals that have been first published and last published in the period named. I do not propose to say much or to give a list of the dear departed. They were born, they struggled for existence, and they died in the effort. That is all that need be said of most of them. There is, however, one defunct paper to which I must make a short reference, partly because I remember something about its birth and death. I refer to the _Birmingham Daily Press_, which first appeared in May, 1855. If my memory serves me, the Act of Parliament repealing the newspaper duty had not passed and become law when the _Birmingham Daily Press_ appeared. Its first issues were, I believe, marked "specimen" copies, which would seem to show that the new penny paper was really published in anticipation of the passing of the Act. Anyway, the _Birmingham Daily Press_ appeared in the year mentioned, and considering that it was altogether a new venture, and that much had to be learned by experience, it was a highly creditable production. It soon made its mark, too, and became popular and largely read. And no wonder. It supplied a real want. Its contents were readable and useful, and its pages contained smart and attractive articles and papers that excited notice and were much appreciated. Mr. George Dawson was connected with the paper. Mr. William Harris was editor, or co-editor, of it, and on its staff and among its contributors were some sharp and able writers. With all these merits and recommendations it will be asked, why did not the _Birmingham Daily Press_ succeed? Well, I do not think I can quite answer the question. I can only say that judging by what I have observed and heard literary excellence, good reporting, and able editing will not make a paper commercially successful. If a newspaper is to succeed in paying its way and making a profit, its business management must be in experienced and competent hands. A daily newspaper is apt to be a deadly drain if its expenditure exceeds its receipts--as the daily loss has to be multiplied by six every week--and this tells up large in the course of a year. There can be no question that the _Birmingham Daily Press_ had a fi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71  
72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Birmingham

 

newspaper

 

appeared

 

published

 
editor
 

succeed

 

papers

 

question

 

connected

 

Harris


William

 

attractive

 

supplied

 
largely
 
popular
 
contents
 

excited

 

articles

 

notice

 

appreciated


George

 

contributors

 

readable

 
contained
 

Dawson

 

business

 
profit
 
management
 

experienced

 
making

commercially
 

successful

 
paying
 

competent

 
expenditure
 

exceeds

 

receipts

 
multiplied
 

deadly

 

editing


reporting

 
recommendations
 

merits

 

writers

 
literary
 

excellence

 

observed

 

answer

 
judging
 

marked