FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73  
74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>   >|  
ou storm upon the star!' would make much worse poetry, but much better sense.... Isn't it strange that I can't feel this about Wordsworth? He was better off without humor, for all his solemn-donkey spots--and it's better for us that he didn't have it. It's probably better for us, too, that Shelley didn't have it--but it wasn't better for _him_. Diddle-diddle-dumpling--what stuff all this is! Go to bed, Susan." * * * * * "There's no use pretending things are different, Susan Blake; you might as well face them and see them through, open-eyed. What does being in love mean? "I suppose if one is really in love, head over heels, one doesn't care what it means. But I don't like pouncing, overwhelming things--things that crush and blast and scorch and blind. I don't like cyclones and earthquakes and conflagrations--at least, I've never experienced any, but I know I shouldn't like them if I did. But I don't think I'd be so terribly afraid of them--though I might. I think I'd be more--sort of--indignant--disgusted." * * * * * Editor's Note: Such English! But pungent stylist as Susan is now acknowledged to be, she is still, in the opinion of academic critics, not sufficiently attentive to formal niceties of diction. She remains too wayward, too impressionistic; in a word, too personal. I am inclined to agree, and yet--am I? * * * * * "It's all very well to stamp round declaiming that you're captain of your soul, but if an earthquake--even a tiny one--comes and shakes your house like a dice box and then scatters you and the family out of it like dice--it wouldn't sound very appropriate for your epitaph. 'I am the master of my fate' would always look silly on a tombstone. Why aren't tombstones a good test for poetry--some poetry? I've never seen anything on a tombstone that looked real--not even the names and dates. "But _does_ love have to be like an earthquake? If it does, then it's just a blind force, and I don't like blind forces. It's stupid to be blind oneself; but it's worse to have blind stupid things butting into one and pushing one about. "Hang it, I don't believe love has to be stupid and blind, and go thrashing through things! Ambo isn't thrashing through things--or Phil either. But, of course, they wouldn't. That's exactly what I mean about love; it can be tamed, civilized. No, not civilized--just tamed. _Co
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73  
74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

things

 

stupid

 

poetry

 

earthquake

 

tombstone

 

wouldn

 
thrashing
 

civilized

 

captain

 
shakes

remains

 

wayward

 

diction

 

niceties

 
attentive
 

formal

 
impressionistic
 

inclined

 

personal

 

declaiming


scatters
 

sufficiently

 

forces

 

butting

 

oneself

 
looked
 

tombstones

 

family

 

epitaph

 

pushing


master

 

dumpling

 

diddle

 

Diddle

 

pretending

 
Shelley
 

strange

 
Wordsworth
 

solemn

 

donkey


suppose

 
indignant
 

disgusted

 

Editor

 

terribly

 

afraid

 
opinion
 

academic

 
acknowledged
 
English