FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  
indeed, I am not sure. Yet in case I am mistaken here, let me say at once I am certain that this return to the restricted family was a necessary and inevitable step. The individual forces had to triumph. This may seem a contradiction to all I have just said. What I wish to show is this: one and all the phases in the development of society have been needful and fruitful as successive stages in growth; yet none can continue--none be regarded as the final stage, for each becomes insufficient and narrow from the standpoint of the needs of a later stage. We have reached the third stage--the patriarchal family which still endures. And last and hardest to eradicate is that monopoly of sexual possession, which says: "This woman and her children are mine: I have tabooed her for life." Mankind has still to outlive this brute instinct in its upward way to civilisation. CHAPTER IX WOMEN AND PRIMITIVE INDUSTRY I have referred in an earlier chapter to a letter from Mr. H. G. Wells, sent to me after the publication of my book, _The Truth about Woman_. Now, there is one sentence in this letter that I wish to quote here, because it brings home just what it is my purpose in this chapter to show--that the mother-age was a civilisation owing its institutions, and its early victories over nature, rather to the genius of woman than to that of man. Mr. Wells does not, indeed, say this. He rejects the mother-age, and in questioning my acceptance of it as a stage in the past histories of societies, he writes: "The primitive matriarchate never was anything more than mother at the washing-tub and father looking miserable." It seems to me that here, in his own inimitable way, Mr. Wells (though I think quite unconsciously) sums up the past labour-history of woman and man. His statement has very far-reaching considerations. It forces us to accept the active utility of primitive woman in the community--a utility more developed and practical than that of man. This was really the basis of women's position of power. The constructive quality of the female mind, at a time when the male attention and energy were fixed chiefly on the destructive activities of warfare, was liberated for use and invention. Women were the seekers, slowly increasing their efficiency. Very much the same account of the primitive sexual division in work was given by an Australian Kurnai to Messrs. Fison and Howitt, in a sentence that has been quoted very freq
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

mother

 

primitive

 

letter

 

chapter

 
utility
 
sexual
 

sentence

 

civilisation

 

forces

 

family


writes

 
history
 

questioning

 

labour

 
washing
 

acceptance

 
statement
 
rejects
 
reaching
 

considerations


inimitable

 

father

 
unconsciously
 

matriarchate

 

societies

 
histories
 

miserable

 

increasing

 
efficiency
 
slowly

seekers
 

liberated

 
invention
 
account
 

Messrs

 

Howitt

 

quoted

 

Kurnai

 
Australian
 

division


warfare

 
activities
 

position

 

constructive

 

genius

 

active

 

community

 

developed

 

practical

 

quality