FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154  
155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   >>  
Apsu, is equally Sumerian. It would be strange indeed if the Sumerians had not evolved a Dragon myth,(2) for the Dragon combat is the most obvious of nature myths and is found in most mythologies of Europe and the Near East. The trailing storm-clouds suggest his serpent form, his fiery tongue is seen in the forked lightning, and, though he may darken the world for a time, the Sun-god will always be victorious. In Egypt the myth of "the Overthrowing of Apep, the enemy of Ra" presents a close parallel to that of Tiamat;(3) but of all Eastern mythologies that of the Chinese has inspired in art the most beautiful treatment of the Dragon, who, however, under his varied forms was for them essentially beneficent. Doubtless the Semites of Babylonia had their own versions of the Dragon combat, both before and after their arrival on the Euphrates, but the particular version which the priests of Babylon wove into their epic is not one of them. (1) See E. de Sarzec, _Decouvertes en Chaldee_, pl. xliv, Fig. 2, and Heuzey, _Catalogue des antiquites chaldeennes_, p. 281. (2) In his very interesting study of "Sumerian and Akkadian Views of Beginnings", contributed to the _Journ. of the Amer. Or. Soc._, Vol. XXXVI (1916), pp. 274 ff., Professor Jastrow suggests that the Dragon combat in the Semitic- Babylonian Creation poem is of Semitic not Sumerian origin. He does not examine the evidence of the poem itself in detail, but bases the suggestion mainly on the two hypotheses, that the Dragon combat of the poem was suggested by the winter storms and floods of the Euphrates Valley, and that the Sumerians came from a mountain region where water was not plentiful. If we grant both assumptions, the suggested conclusion does not seem to me necessarily to follow, in view of the evidence we now possess as to the remote date of the Sumerian settlement in the Euphrates Valley. Some evidence may still be held to point to a mountain home for the proto-Sumerians, such as the name of their early goddess Ninkharsagga, "the Lady of the Mountains". But, as we must now regard Babylonia itself as the cradle of their civilization, other data tend to lose something of their apparent significance. It is true that the same Sumerian sign means "land" and "mountain"; but it may have been difficult to obtain an intelligible profile
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154  
155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   >>  



Top keywords:

Dragon

 

Sumerian

 

combat

 

Euphrates

 
mountain
 
evidence
 

Sumerians

 

Semitic

 

suggested

 

Babylonia


mythologies

 
Valley
 

region

 

hypotheses

 
winter
 

storms

 
floods
 
profile
 
Professor
 

Jastrow


suggests

 

contributed

 
plentiful
 

detail

 

suggestion

 
examine
 

Babylonian

 

Creation

 
Beginnings
 
origin

civilization
 

cradle

 
regard
 
Ninkharsagga
 

Mountains

 

difficult

 

obtain

 

apparent

 
significance
 

goddess


follow

 
intelligible
 

possess

 

necessarily

 

assumptions

 

conclusion

 

remote

 

settlement

 

Sarzec

 

victorious