FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260  
261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   >>  
ch 2, 1833_. VETO MESSAGES.[16] [Footnote 16: Pocket vetoes.] WASHINGTON, _December 6, 1832_. _To the Senate of the United States_: I avail myself of this early opportunity to return to the Senate, in which it originated, the bill entitled "An act providing for the final settlement of the claims of States for interest on advances to the United States made during the last war," with the reasons which induced me to withhold my approbation, in consequence of which it has failed to become a law. This bill was presented to me for my signature on the last day of your session, and when I was compelled to consider a variety of other bills of greater urgency to the public service. It obviously embraced a principle in the allowance of interest different from that which had been sanctioned by the practice of the accounting officers or by the previous legislation of Congress in regard to the advances by the States, and without any apparent grounds for the change. Previously to giving my sanction to so great an extension of the practice of allowing interest upon accounts with the Government, and which in its consequences and from analogy might not only call for large payments from the Treasury, but disturb the great mass of individual accounts long since finally settled, I deemed it my duty to make a more thorough investigation of the subject than it was possible for me to do previously to the close of your last session. I adopted this course the more readily from the consideration that as the bill contained no appropriation the States which would have been entitled to claim its benefits could not have received them without the fuller legislation of Congress. The principle which this bill authorizes varies not only from the practice uniformly adopted by many of the accounting officers in the case of individual accounts and in those of the States finally settled and closed previously to your last session, but also from that pursued under the act of your last session for the adjustment and settlement of the claims of the State of South Carolina. This last act prescribed no particular mode for the allowance of interest, which, therefore, in conformity with the directions of Congress in previous cases and with the uniform practice of the Auditor by whom the account was settled, was computed on the sums expended by the State of South Carolina for the use and benefit of the United States, and which had been repaid
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260  
261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   >>  



Top keywords:

States

 

practice

 

interest

 

session

 
United
 
accounts
 

settled

 

Congress

 

principle

 

allowance


finally

 
individual
 

adopted

 

legislation

 
previously
 

officers

 
Carolina
 
accounting
 
previous
 

Senate


advances

 

claims

 
entitled
 

settlement

 

contained

 
MESSAGES
 

readily

 

consideration

 
received
 
benefits

appropriation
 

vetoes

 
deemed
 
WASHINGTON
 

December

 

Pocket

 

Footnote

 

subject

 
investigation
 

uniform


Auditor

 
directions
 

conformity

 

account

 

benefit

 

repaid

 

expended

 

computed

 

prescribed

 

uniformly