FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  
x machines. [Illustration: Figure 29.--Section through cabin of the Otis elevator. Note the pivoted floor-sections. As the car traveled, these floor-sections were leveled by the operator to compensate for the change of inclination; however, they were soon removed because they interfered with the loading and unloading of passengers. (From _La Nature_, May 4, 1889, vol. 17, p. 360.)] Here then was a design exhibiting strange contrast. It was on the one hand completely novel, devised expressly for this trying service; yet on the other hand it was derived from and fundamentally based on a thoroughly traditional system. If nothing else, it was safe beyond question. In Eiffel's own words, the Roux lifts "not only were safe, but appeared safe; a most desirable feature in lifts traveling to such heights and carrying the general public."[12] The system's shortcomings could hardly be more evident. Friction resulting from the more than 320 joints in the flexible pistons, each carrying two rollers, plus that from the pitch chains must have been immense. The noise created by such multiplicity of parts can only be imagined. Capacity was equivalent to that of the Otis system. About 100 people could be carried in the double-deck cabin, some standing. The speed, however, was only 200 feet per minute, understandably low. If it had been the initial intention of the designers to operate their cars to the second platform, they must shortly have become aware of the impracticability of this plan, caused by an inherent characteristic of the apparatus. As long as the compressive force acted along the longitudinal axis of the links, there was no lateral resultant and the only load on the small rollers was that due to the dead weight of the link itself. However, if a curve had been introduced in the guide channels to increase the incline of the upper run, as done by Otis, the force on those links traversing the bend would have been eccentric--assuming the car to be in the upper section, above the bend. The difference between the two sections (based upon the Otis system) was 78 deg.9' minus 54 deg.35', or 23 deg.34', the tangent of which equals 0.436. Forty-three percent of the unbalanced weight of the car and load would then have borne upon the, say, 12 sets of rollers on the curve. The immense frictional load thus added to the entire system would certainly have made it dismally inefficient, if not actually unworkable. In spite of E
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  



Top keywords:

system

 

rollers

 

sections

 

weight

 

carrying

 

immense

 

resultant

 

intention

 
designers
 
operate

Illustration

 
understandably
 

minute

 

lateral

 

initial

 
shortly
 

caused

 
compressive
 

apparatus

 

inherent


longitudinal

 
characteristic
 

platform

 
impracticability
 

increase

 

percent

 
unbalanced
 

tangent

 

equals

 

frictional


inefficient
 

unworkable

 
dismally
 

entire

 

traversing

 

machines

 

incline

 

However

 

introduced

 

channels


eccentric

 

assuming

 
section
 
difference
 

completely

 

devised

 

expressly

 

design

 

exhibiting

 

strange