FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  
onsideration by the Commission. The bidding time was extended, and many attempts were made to attract a native design but none was forthcoming. As time grew short, it became imperative to resolve the matter, and the Commission, in desperation, awarded the contract to Otis in July 1887 for the amount of $22,500.[10] A curious footnote to the affair appeared much later in the form of a published interview[11] with W. Frank Hall, Otis' Paris representative: "Yes," said Mr. Hall, "this is the first elevator of its kind. Our people for thirty-eight years have been doing this work, and have constructed thousands of elevators vertically, and many on an incline, but never one to strike a radius of 160 feet for a distance of over 50 feet. It has required a great amount of preparatory study and we have worked on it for three years." "That was before you got the contract?" "Quite so, but we knew that, although the French authorities were very reluctant to give away this piece of work, they would be bound to come to us, and so we were preparing for them." Such supreme confidence must have rapidly evaporated as events progressed. Despite the invaluable advertising to be derived from an installation of such distinction, the Otises would probably have defaulted had they foreseen the difficulties which preceded completion of the work. [Illustration: Figure 24.--General arrangement of Otis elevator system in Eiffel Tower. (From _The Engineer_ (London), July 19, 1889, vol. 68, p. 58.)] The proposed system (fig. 24) was based fundamentally upon Otis' standard hydraulic elevator, but it was recognizable only in basic operating principle (fig. 25). Tracks of regular rail section replaced the guides because of the incline, and the double-decked cabin (fig. 29) ran on small flanged wheels. This much of the apparatus was really not unlike that of an ordinary inclined railway. Motive power was provided by the customary hydraulic cylinder (fig. 26), set on an angle roughly equal to the incline of the lower section of run. Balancing the cabin's dead weight was a counterpoise carriage (fig. 27) loaded with pig iron that traveled on a second set of rails beneath the main track. Like the driving system, the counterweight was rope-geared, 3 to 1, so that its travel was about 125 feet to the cabin's 377 feet. [Illustration: Figure 25.--Schematic diagram of the rigging of the Otis
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  



Top keywords:

elevator

 

system

 

incline

 

hydraulic

 

section

 

amount

 

Figure

 

Commission

 
contract
 

Illustration


Tracks

 

regular

 

foreseen

 
difficulties
 

operating

 
principle
 
defaulted
 
Otises
 

London

 
replaced

guides

 

double

 

preceded

 

Eiffel

 

fundamentally

 

Engineer

 

proposed

 

arrangement

 

General

 
recognizable

completion
 
standard
 
ordinary
 

beneath

 

traveled

 

carriage

 
counterpoise
 
loaded
 
driving
 

Schematic


diagram
 

rigging

 

travel

 

counterweight

 

geared

 

weight

 

unlike

 

distinction

 

inclined

 

apparatus