e same
field.
This work testifies to the truth, that it is a mark of true greatness to
be modest. The most superficial examination of these volumes exhibits a
_Corpus Ignatianum_ superior to anything yet published. It is, says Dr.
Harnack,[64] 'without exaggeration the most learned and careful
Patristic monograph which has appeared in the nineteenth century.' It
exhibits 'a diligence and knowledge of the subject which show that Dr.
Lightfoot has made himself master of this department, and placed himself
beyond the reach of any rival.... There is nothing in it that is not up
to date, and the whole treatise forms a well-knit unity.' This is the
willing testimony of one of the ablest of the scholars of Germany who
have handled the great questions connected with Ignatius; the testimony,
moreover, of one who, as we shall see presently, finds himself at
variance with the Bishop upon two points, especially which, more than
any other, materially affect the genuineness of the Epistles and their
date. Such, however, is not the Bishop of Durham's thought. As he looks
back upon the work to which he has consecrated the prime of his life, he
speaks of it in language touching in its modesty--
'I have striven to make the materials for the text as
complete as I could.... Of the use which I have made of the
critical materials I must leave others to judge. Of the
introductions, exegetical notes, and dissertations, I need
say nothing, except that I have spared no pains to make them
adequate, so far as my knowledge and ability permitted. The
translations are intended not only to convey to English
readers the sense of the original, but also (where there was
any difficulty of construction) to serve as commentaries on
the Greek. My anxiety not to evade these difficulties forbad
me in many cases to indulge in a freedom which I should have
claimed, if a literary standard alone had been kept in
view.'
He follows up such words by others, conveying his thanks to those who
have helped him in his work, and the generosity of his recognition of
their services does but enhance the reserveful simplicity with which he
comments upon his own. The 'English reader' and the 'others' whose
judgment he desires, will, at least in England, unite in rendering to
him a respectful and grateful homage. The subject treated by the Bishop
is in a very real sense an Englishman's subject. For three cen
|