The Project Gutenberg EBook of Answer to Dr. Priestley's Letters to a
Philosophical Unbeliever, by Matthew Turner
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: Answer to Dr. Priestley's Letters to a Philosophical Unbeliever
Author: Matthew Turner
Release Date: November 22, 2004 [EBook #14120]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ASCII
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ANSWER TO DR. PRIESTLEY ***
Attributed to Matthew Turner (d. 1788?) and William Hammon.
Transcribed by the Freethought Archives
NOTE: Irregularities in orthography and punctuation have been
reproduced without emendation from the first edition of 1782.
ANSWER TO DR. PRIESTLEY'S LETTERS TO A PHILOSOPHICAL UNBELIEVER.
PART I.
LONDON.
MDCCLXXXII
ADVERTISEMENT.
The Editor of this publication has more in object to answer Dr. Priestley
than to deliver his own sentiments upon Natural Religion, which however
he has no inclination to disguise: but he does not mean to be answerable
for them farther, than as by reason and nature he is at present
instructed. The question here handled is not so much, whether a
Deity and his attributed excellences exist, as whether there is any
Natural or Moral proof of his existence and of those attributes.
Revealed knowledge is not descanted upon; therefore Christians at least
need take no offence. Doubts upon Natural Religion have not hitherto
been looked upon as attacks upon Revelation, but rather as corroborations
of it. What the Editor believes as a Christian (if he is one is
therefore another affair, nor does he reckon himself so infallible or
incapable of alteration in his sentiments, as not at another time to
adopt different ones upon more reflexion and better information;
therefore, though he has at present little or no doubt of what he
asserts (taken upon the principles laid down) he shall hold himself
totally freed from any necessity of defending the contents of this
publication if brought into controversy; and as he has no desire of
making converts, hopes he shall not himself be marked out as an object
of persecution.
Speculative points have always been esteemed fair matters for a free
discussion. The religion established in t
|